Ipswich Community Television

 

 


DVD Review: ‘Hanna’


Hanna Poster

 


Part action thriller. Part travelogue. Part coming-of-age drama. Part fairy tale. Part delusional fever dream. If there’s one thing that ‘Hanna’ definitely is on the whole, that thing would be odd. But in being so, Joe Wright has crafted one of the best, most unique blockbusters to come out of Hollywood in a long time. Best known for his stylish yet grounded dramas ‘Atonement’ and ‘The Soloist’, ‘Hanna’ marks a change of pace for British director Wright, but is no less uncompromising for it. Telling the story of a young German girl (Saoirse Ronan) brought up by her dad to be an assassin, and the subsequent pursuit of her by American intelligence agencies, ‘Hanna’ sounds like a familiar, everyday action film. One of the joys of this film, however, is how utterly incomparable it is to everything else. The plot gives echoes of ‘Leon’, but they’re nothing alike. The globe-trotting espionage-y stuff sounds a bit Bond-ish, but, really, it’s not. In fact, the closest comparison point is 1998’s ‘Run Lola Run’. But this is really only it’s stylish overdrive, showing that a film doesn’t have to be ponderous or profound to be art. In fact, that’s one of the few issues with ‘Hanna’ - sometimes it can be a case of style over substance. But it’s hard to complain about a film that looks so gorgeous. The makers clearly have a sharp eye for scenery, and a fair bit of the film amounts to ‘chases through unique, aesthetically pleasing’ locations. All accompanied by a phenomenal soundtrack of pumping retro techno supplied by the Chemical Brothers. Apart from Cate Blanchett’s odd Texan accent, ‘Hanna’ is a sublime piece by filmmakers who clearly love what they do. 4 / 5

 

Halloween: Curse/H20/Resurrection Reviews

Over in the United States there are going to be releases of three Halloween films for the first time on Blu-Ray format but as always there is no word on the releases here in the United Kingdom and to make things just a little bit more insulting they are trying to fob us off with just another DVD re-release with literally nothing to distinguish them from the ones some of us already possess.

Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)

The Curse of Micheal Myers

This, the fifth sequel to John Carpenter’s masterpiece Halloween, is named the Curse of Michael Myers because screenwriter Daniel Farrands made a little joke about the so called cursed production of the film and that unfortunately the one aspect that stands out in Curse is the disjointed and troubled nature.

The plot follows on from Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers and answers some of more bizarre questions that were raised, namely the mysterious man (The Man in Black) and the strange marking on Michael’s wrist.

Now, here’s where it gets a little bizarre. The symbol is a rune of Thorn and it’s on Michael’s wrist because he has been cursed by Thorn. The Curse of Thorn is a constellation that could appear during Halloween and to prevent mass death among different tribes, one family was chosen to bear this curse and the curse would require the bearer to sacrificially murder his/her entire family which would prevent drought and plague to the other families, the curse gives the bearer inhuman strength and immunity from death. This is the explanation of why Michael is hellbent on killing his family and why he cannot die, confused?

Well so is everyone who has seen the theatrical version because these things are explained to the degree that they are in the infamous Producer’s Cut, the superior version of the film. In a nutshell this version is terrible and leave’s out so much but unfortunately there have been no official releases of the Producer’s Cut and it is only obtainable via bootleg copies. If you’re a fan of the Halloween franchise then you’ll be angry that this version is getting another re-release but until Disney (who own the rights) decide to release the other version you’ll have to learn to love it or just skip it completely.

When it comes to originality you have to give it kudos because it tries to do some vastly different within the Halloween franchise but not in the Halloween III: Season of the Witch way, it utilises everything fans love about the series and just changes them to make it feel a little more fresh and original than its predecessors. It’s just a shame that this version is so badly put together.

Grade: D+

Check it out if you must but be warned you’ll be left wanting a lot more from it.

Halloween H20: 20 Years Later (1998)

H2O Poster

After the bad reception of Curse it was decided that they needed to reboot whilst taking it back to its boots and that’s exactly what Halloween H20 is, a reboot of theHalloween franchise that ignores Return (4), Revenge (5) and Curse (6) (Season is always ignored in continuity).

It’s continuity is taken directly from the original and the sequel and coming as a sequel to part two more than the first it’s a fantastic sequel. Not the mention Jamie Lee Curtis is as fantastic as ever here in the role that kick-started her career.

The plot focuses on Laurie Strode (Curtis) who has changed her name to Keri Tate and she is in hiding from her previous life after nearly being murdered by her brother Michael Myers, nobody she knows has any idea who she is to protect her and her son (Josh Harnett) but she’s not safe when Michael finds out who and where she is and he seeks out to finish what he started twenty years ago.

There is so much to love in H20 some fans may find that they have been slapped in the face because it fails to acknowledge the prior three instalments but if you learn to put this anger to one side you’ll find not only a lot of fantastically staged suspenseful sequences, you’ll find some great cameos (the nurse from the original is in the opening) and some great in jokes one such example being that Curtis has a conversation with her secretary Norma Watson (Janet Leigh, Curtis’ real life mother and star of Psycho) about motherhood.

One very interesting aspect here is the idea that it’s trying to show the slashers released at this time how it’s done because let’s face it Halloween opened up the slasher film in a lot of ways and it tries to show audiences how a slasher film should be done. Sure there are negative aspects like sometimes it feels a little flat in the script side of things but overall it’s an unrelenting and often brutal sequel that does justice to the overall failed series.

Grade: A-

Brutal and quite terrifying this entry into the series is really something to marvel over especially considering it’s a sixth sequel or third depending on what logic you choose to follow.

Halloween: Resurrection (2002)

Halloween Ressurrection

H20 was a fantastic entry into the Halloween franchise it brought the series back to basics and it was truly frightening as well as being very well put together by the great Steve Miner (Friday the 13th Parts 2 & 3) and of course the return of the always on top form Jamie Lee Curtis.

Resurrection on the other hand is the furthest step back ever for a series to take, think Saw VII: The Final Chapter or Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood.

It directly follows the events of H20 and Michael manages to come back once again (in one of most under thought and lacklustre ways ever I hence to add) and he goes back to Haddonfield after visiting his sister in the hospital for a close family chat that ends in Laurie’s death. We are then led to believe that Michael is dead once more but of course he isn’t not as long as there are greedy producer’s trying to milk something for more than it’s worth.

Skip to a year later where it focuses on two programmers (Busta Rhymes and Tyra Banks) who work for a reality television company called DangerTainment (permission to roll your eyes or lose faith in scriptwriters everywhere either would be appropriate) and their next venture is to send a group of thrill seeking teenagers into the Myers house for a night. But of course it’s not that simple because Michael is not dead and wants to kill them for trespassing on his property.

Somehow everything that was bad about the Halloween franchise has been amplified and everything that was good and even great about it has been laid to rest and who is to blame this time around? It’s not wholly the screenwriter’s fault because originally it was going to be thrilling and suspenseful like the others and more importantly like its predecessor but test audiences responded more to the idea of Busta Rhymes’s character using karate moves on the Michael Myers, this time around he is not so much a boogeyman as much as a big joke, much like the film itself. See how much a test audience can change things? But, the screenwriters Larry Brand and Sean Hood (Cube 2 and Psychic Murders, respectively) do have to take a lot of blame for the badly written characters, the laughable dialogue and of course the tragically painful story.

It’s not comprehensible why it’s as bad as it is because by rights they should have been able to replicate the success of H20 but sadly not they fail as miserably here as they did with Revenge and that was pretty shoddy.

Grade: F

Save yourself the bother, Resurrection is terrible and easily the worst of –mostly- bad sequels to John Carpenter’s masterpiece.